Showing posts with label hypnosis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hypnosis. Show all posts

6 February 2014

Sad Fury / Furiously Sad

By Roger Colins

Instead of dealing with our problems, Freud gave us all the easy way out with this lethal invention. 

Thinking that one has depression, makes one depressed. It's a paradox. It doesn't even exist and yet our clever little brains can force it into reality.

Try sadness or anger. It has to be one or the other and both are useful where depression is not. Being sad lets us educate our emotions, teaches us what to avoid in the future and how to deal with it when it does happen again. Anger will do the same but can also be used as motivation.

Sadness means that when we're done, we'll return to being content along with some added perspective. A little faith in the knowledge that the feeling won't last forever but will come back, and when it does, a little less intense next time. The same goes for happiness.

We want to avoid unhappiness and anger, that's what the purpose for them are. To identify the emotion, recognise it and discover where it came from so that in the future, such things may be preventable.

The only certainty we live with is death and we will always be sad when things come to an end but even then, the end is important in all things. When sadness ends, happiness begins and vice versa.

Emotions teach us to not waste our time. The trick would be to stay content.


Grumpy Teenagers

Puberty drips mind bending hormones into our blood to fire up an all enveloping furnace that burns the heart right out of us, replacing it with that annoying, infuriating sex drive.

If there were such a thing as a heart monitor for our emotional state then it would show a steady sinus rhythm up until puberty, and then go nuts. Every day after that, is a fight. A headlong, never ending war to get that insane pitch and trough back to a normal sinus rhythm.

The faster these ups and downs can be moderated, the less likely one is going to feel the illusion of depression.

Ecstatic joy is certainly a wonderful thing and where we would all want to stay, twenty four hours a day. It's not ideal however, as being mortifyingly sad every day is exactly the same thing.

What we're really after is serenity, a neutral balance between the two.

We know that happy times will come and go, we know sad times will come and go but until then, we need to be cool, calm and relaxed to see past the cloudy confusion of our emotions and work out what it was that made us so happy, what it was that made us so sad.


Neuro Chemicals

Shrinks play a dangerous game with patients because a patient will look up to their counsellor for help, even if that professional has the honesty to admit they really don't have a clue.

The patient still wants to believe this person must have some kind of understanding of the condition. They've been studying the damn subject for years. They must have some sort of answer.

Drugs, all drugs, do the exact same thing. Change the emotional state you're in. Anti depressants are specifically designed to simply remove all awareness of emotion. This is dangerous because they also remove progress. Drugs are a stop gap, the symptoms are temporarily removed but the problem carries on and gets worse the more it's left unaddressed.


Good can feel bad, Bad can feel good. Confusing, but quite fine because all that is happening is our emotions trying to figure out what we like and what we don't.

If a person managed to maintain a perfectly objective point of view upon experiencing their first kiss, or their first war time fire fight, they would not learn which they liked or not.

That person would find that they like everything and fear nothing. While the entire universe may turn into an ancient Greek interpretation of beauty, that person may be considered psychopathic and slightly less human, for these emotions are meant to make us what we are.

Therefore, a 'healthy' human would again balance them-self halfway between psychopathy and mania.


Hypnotised

Depression doesn't strictly exist because it cannot be defined. It's just a trick the mind plays to get around the problem because we can't see the forest for the trees.

Figuring out why we are depressed is insane, and that's the point. It simply doesn't exist because there is no such thing.

What we're displaying are the symptoms of utter confusion, not depression because we are so certain that it exists, so certain we feel like utter useless shit and want to know why, so it can be solved.

While logical, this happens only because objective reasoning has been replaced with an easy tag line that looks so damn accurate, but if you were to try and objectively reason what depression is you would only come up with a list of symptoms and nothing else.

Being depressed is nothing more than dancing around a problem one is afraid to face and the problem we need to face, simply doesn't exist; The problem of not knowing. Once we can admit that we don't know and may never know, then we can get back to the things that we do know and can work with.


People who are depressed are to be highly praised. These people look at life with an ideology that is pure and honest. These people view life in it's truest glory and understand that there is a solution to all problems so long as we work at them, for they have gone so far as to seek out a problem that doesn't even exist.

This is an innate, natural human condition that we all have to go through one way or another. It is the resolution of depression that is the trick, for depression is real and it's solution, illusory yet the illusory solution is based in logic and reality. Paradox solved.


Training

If everyone insists that something is real then you'll have a hard time believing anything contrary.

Control by training. It works best while still young. The brain stays quite plastic (changeable) up until the mid twenties so you've got a good ten years to teach yourself how to process the new slant to pubescent emotions.

If you're still depressed in your thirties, it's not too late but it is more difficult and this training has to employ slightly more advanced practices to compensate for a greater knowledge base but the method remains the same.

Training takes will power with concrete knowlegde and that is what we are having to learn. Instead of feeding off an emotion when it arrives, you take moment, breath once or twice and observe that emotion from a semi removed aspect.

Feel it, instead of allowing it to overwhelm and control.

Teaching oneself to control the effects of that emotion is the point so that there is give and take between the conscious part of you that conducts all deliberate action, and the randomly wired brain that fires off neurons which ever way it feels like, whenever it feels like doing it.

One can of course go too far and start feeling nothing at all. This is the same as feeling everything all the time so training has to also account for when, how much is too much sadness, or too much joy, or too much neutrality.


Anger versus Sadness

Depression accounts for these two emotions. They are in opposition. Anger is passionate, strong, a growling intensity that wants to do something positive, something actionable and fight out against that which we deem wrong.

Sadness is the opposite. Apathy, weakness, pointlessness and passive suffering. When these two opposites get mixed up then we become totally confused and label it depression.

It is worthwhile working backwards and do every effort to split depression back into these two constituents.

Deciding which bit is making us sad and which bit is making us angry gives something to work with and we'll be able to work through each in turn.

One might be depressed about work, a reason being that there is no satisfaction. We're angry that we are forced to endure this pointless job and that makes us sad. We are sad because we are unable to do anything about it, and that makes us angry.

Whichever emotion came first is the one to focus on and work through, without allowing it to delineate to the second. Stick with anger or stick with sadness because on their own there is resolve.

If sad, go talk to a loved one, cry your heart and let them feel that sadness. If angry, take a pillow and beat the shit out of it, scream, jump or run for as long and hard as you can.

Just make sure you don't let one emotion become the other until you've sorted out the first one first.

#psychology #emotions #depression

25 January 2014

Contradiction with Terms

By Roger Colins 

___________________________________________________________
Contradiction. If you don't already know what it is;

contra|dic¦tion

Pronunciation: /kɒntrəˈdɪkʃ(ə)n

1. a combination of statements, ideas, or features which are opposed to one another: 'the proposed new system suffers from a set of internal contradictions'
2. a situation in which inconsistent elements are present: 'the paradox of using force to overcome force is a real contradiction'
3. [mass noun] 'the statement of a position opposite to one already made: 'the second sentence appears to be in flat contradiction of the first'
    [count noun]: 'the experiment provides a contradiction of the hypothesis'

(Courtesy of the Oxford English Dictionary)

Normally, when we come across contradiction there is one of two choices. First is most obvious. The contradiction is erroneous and false, we do away with it immediately. The next option is to read between the lines and divine the underlying conflict that's been illustrated by use of simplification with two opposing factors in order to evoke, incite or elicit a specific cognitive equation. The solution is down to you.

It is possible we have been remiss. It's always possible. There is a third option and the reader should allow a moment to guess at this point, whilst a clue is hidden in plain sight. The third choice you didn't see is halfway between the first two options and the holding ground for literalism.

To contradict. The effect of literal contradiction is neither sarcastic nor ironic but that of both, neither and one. Firstly, literal contradiction possesses two elements in opposition as would any, whether ironic or sarcastic.

'He's on fire and yet so cool.' - All contradictions must always delineate opposition.

Next. Literal contradiction will not be sarcastic or ironic. In order to achieve sarcasm there has to be double entendre; two meanings, and in order to achieve irony, a third. Therefore our literal connotation arrives at one. Contradiction is not three nor two but one meaning. The contradictory statement is not contradictory; hence, literal contradiction. If there are any more than three positively identifiable connotations, we venture into the realm of wit.

Irony and sarcasm can of course be witty, but having numerically counted the references of each we have no other choice but to assign their appropriate value. All together now and in descending order, wit, irony, sarcasm, contradiction and statement.

Let's attack it from the reverse angle. A statement can only have one possible outcome. If it has any others then it loses it's lethargy.

'The black cat has a white tail.' No real room to manoeuvre.

Sarcasm more often crops up in spoken language thanks to insinuative pitch and timing, not that it cannot be found in literature but only that it is difficult to replicate without expert timing and flawless context. Two meanings appear to be much harder than one or three and most certainly, more difficult than our literature flooded, wit.

Life or Death

The beauty, if you can call it that, of contradiction is that it can disguise itself as any one of the others. If it looks clever, then surely it must be.

Wrong. Contradictions by their very nature spark off a ream of purposeless dreaming without end and this is nearly always mistaken for something truly valuable.

If something is witty then it says one thing in many ways.

If something is ironic, it says it in two ways to get a third and if something is is sarcastic it says it one way to get two. A statement is of course one to get one.

Mistakes can mean life or death. 
Why do we chance it?
Now, if you were passing on life or death 
information. Do you really think you would use anything except a pure, unadulterated statement?

'Stop!' or would you try

'Red lights usually mean Go, don't they?' perhaps

'Strange, a traffic light on a straight road?' and if you're ever so quick you could venture

'They're going to swap green for red one of these days.'

Am I Dreaming?

At the very same time, have you ever come across fictional literature that used only statements? If so, I bet you put the thing back down and carefully nudged it away with a stick. That previous sentence may well have been sarcastic but if so, can you get any more than two definitive meanings out of it? The book was bad. The book was so bad I treated it as if it were diseased. There any deeper meaning? No.

If it were contradictory then you could get a million, should you so waste your time waddling around in your own head. It will make you think, sure, but what are you thinking about? Everything and nothing.

Your mind is watching a tennis match without score and the whole exercise, mental masturbation. It feels good but shrouds the truth of the matter because it looked so much more damn puzzling than anything you'd ever seen before, sending you off to eternity.

We humans love puzzles but remember, we turn rage frightful when led down a road without solution.

Stare at a white wall, summon up everything in existence that has to do with wall or white or sight. You can start with the first letter 'W' and count off every word beginning with that. This is contradiction. If there is absolutely no definite, singular imperative to any one string of words then this is instigation to dream, and arrive at your own conclusions. Arrive ye shall and attribute thine newly found wisdom to that one contradiction as if it were genius when it was nothing more than another man dreaming.

Not as easy as it seems

Take a long, hard, look at the title of this post and decide for yourself if it is a statement, sarcastic, ironic, wit or contradiction. I have not given a full example of literal contradiction thus far. Only now shall I grant a handful. My only suggestion is that you count the ways they can be interpreted. These are but the simplest examples I could find and still, I leave you to decide for yourself. That is all.

'One has to be cruel to be kind'

'People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid'

'Facts are the enemy of truth'

'Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance'

'When you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss also gazes into you'

'Wit is educated insolence'

'It is dangerous to be sincere unless you are also stupid'

'Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same'

'Show me a sane man and I will cure him for you'

'The spiritual man makes judgements about all things, but he himself is not subject to any man's judgement'





contradiction
literature
definition

24 January 2014

Diamonds at Dogs

By Roger Colins 
____________________________________________________________
Who's a pretty boy?
Should a charitable act be made in public or privacy? Publicly, it's the demonstration of bravery, kindness and compassion for others to do likewise. If made privately then the person cannot be accused of vanity.

I find this remarkably similar to an old motto;

'Don't throw diamonds at dogs.'
 
Dogs can even be interchanged for pigs, depending on which you consider more arrogant. Motto being, to save your time and energy for something worthwhile.

The argument can be made that sometime later, mister dog may come upon that diamond and snatch it up while no one's looking therefore it has been worthwhile, although the good Samaritan will never know.

The other slant to the saying is ugly. The gesture of charity to encourage others happens to be a double edged sword. Praising the gesture for it's genuine benevolence and not the gesture's purpose, results in the opposite intended effect. This genuine applause means the public will clap the next one they see without ever considering to give themselves.

This happens because the reception of the gesture is seen as showing off and, trying to make everyone feel guilty for being so mean. Some, may act upon that feeling and make a donation themselves but odds are they'll still feel weird.

It wasn't their idea in the first place and there's no public backing them up with cameras and microphones.

The clapping and cheering is there to spite such a display of atrocious vanity because the audience is quite well in their moral standpoint, happy to give the philanthropist his moment of glory in the hope to encourage him to do it again.

Private donations do not seem to warrant investigation, until you use the dog analogy. The gesture is actually the same, showing off. The dog has no use for the diamond and made to feel perturbed by such arrogance that the thrower, with all his lofty superiority, can't even see the dog doesn't care.

This is however, a private donation.

The dog doesn't get to say no, no one is going to stop the thrower and no one likes taking charity. Crazy, no?

Reality Check-Mate

Next we have a beauty. Are any charity donations ever praisable?

They are stop gap measures, the person that goes to a birthday party with a gift voucher to show he genuinely doesn't care. Instead of handing over a check, the donor could go and buy some bread and give it to the poor himself. Take along a camera crew, film the whole damn exercise in order to drive that gesture home.

There is a chance that could be seen as force feeding the dog therefore we arrive at the final step, teaching the dog to grow his own diamonds.

Did the analogies get too mixed? The dog never liked diamonds in the first place. 'Fair enough' says the philanthropist, the dog could sell them. He still doesn't like diamonds, besides, the pigs will come along and steal them. Security, the philanthropist will teach the dog kung-fu. The dog asks what this kung-fu is, and still isn't interested in diamonds. Philanthropist goes home and picks up some bread on his way. The dog licks his nuts in a pile of diamonds.

There was another motto in there and in case you missed it's

'Give a man a fish, he can eat for a day. Teach him to fish, he can eat for a lifetime.'

The dog still wasn't interested because he already knew, what's valuable to the philanthropist is out of kilter with what the dog wants.

In none of these mottoes has the dog ever been asked what he wanted and if he were, he'd probably want to just be left alone, pigs and all.

charity
vanity
philosophy

17 January 2014

Subliminal Messaging

By Roger Colins

Spot anything other than Ned?
Subliminal messaging seeds thoughts and ideas in the back of our heads without our conscious awareness. 

Negatives are a prime example of this effect. The brain doesn't hear negatives. If told not to think of a green house, you'll immediately think of one. Most commonly, the trick is used in advertising, marketing and sales. Subliminal messaging is essentially a form of hypnosis as the victim's will is being toyed with. Here's a short example.
__________________________________________________________
'If it were the right price, you'd buy it, wouldn't you?' tag question. No one can answer no, so

'Yes'

'You have the paint range selected personally by you.' customer nods in understanding, not agreement. 'After we send it to the factory you can have it in about three weeks.' nods again 'So, when can we make the appointment?' Close.

The salesman has already made you say yes, then, makes you think of something unrelated. This is in order to distract for a moment while you try to connect his first line to the next. You know you said yes but to what, you can't remember any more. There is no connection and he has managed to confuse, just for a second. Lastly, while you're listening and thinking, the salesman jumps you with an assumption, once again cutting off your thought process. You're on the spot, don't want to disappoint the lovely man and just settle for agreeing to the sale. The 'Yes' was the subliminal message and how it works are the connections to it.

As far as the top name brands are concerned they just want to remind you that they are still the best. Coca Cola, Nike, Apple all bombard the general public with slogans and labels. Although we will look, we not think about it. The image is just there to reinforce their grip on the market.

Subliminal messaging is more subtle. In addition to the logo flashing across a screen, they throw in a clip of your favourite pop music to make it more appealing. This tells you that they have the same taste as you in music even if you don't have the same taste in drinks, trainers or computers. Subliminal messaging can more subtle than even that.

I like to think of it as liminal messaging. This trick here is to encourage actively conscious thought on the subject matter. Take 'The Wolf of Wall Street'. Scorsese is well known for cinematic violence and his movies have an attractive quality because of it. He has however done movies without violence but even though they are just as good if not better, they have not done as well at the box office than those with the trademark blood and swearing. More than that, after having walked out of a movie jam packed with more swear words than any other in living memory, can you honestly say you will swear less after having watched it? Monkey see, monkey do and if we are not careful about looking out for the tell tale signs of subliminal messaging then we have no defence against it and soak up every last bit of it. Positives, negatives, blunt and subtle.

The news and media are no different. They learnt this trick by sheer accident and now it's used as the gold standard. Instead of trying to cover up a scandal or ignore a humanitarian catastrophe it is simply easier and more effective to report on it and every other to saturate our expectations. If a nuclear bomb were dropped on China, seven nuclear bombs say, there would be world war. Imagine there were no scandalous reports in the current day media and had not been for a number of years. Along comes a nuclear bomb of presidential assassination or phone hacking or sexual assault, there world be the media equivalent to world war. No one would put up with it.

As the media is now a soapbox for everyone's worst sins, we put up with it because it appears to be the norm, accept that because it is being reported someone else is going to do something about it and are resolved that it is not our problem. If China were hit with actual, nuclear bombs, I do not believe people would let it slide unless everyone were being hit with them too.

Subliminal messaging is clever but not as clever as an on-the-nose-double-blind. It's fun, entertaining and just like a Martin Scorsese movie.

subliminal_messaging
hypnotism
media

11 January 2014

Frills or Dressing?


 By Roger Colins

I write a no frills blog. Hope you like it, but in all seriousness I'm not a photographer so you won't find any photos or images unless I think them really worthy of a single post. You won't find any videos, this is a literature blog. You might find an audiobook in the near future but that's it, you won't find any frills of any kind anywhere on this page so, safe to say, I don't like frills.

Not quite. I like Snoopy. My frills are different. I run Linux openSUSE on my computer. It is a frill. I have a temperature widget, a RAM widget, network and notepad widget on my desktop. Mere examples as they are right in front of me but, these are frills. It's dressing I have a problem with. Forgive use of the same analogy but adverts are dressing, links are dressing, references, dressing to make your thesis, your blog, your car more appealing and this fashion is unattractive. I rely upon content. I do not want to distract my reader in any way shape or form while presenting the core and essence of what I'm breaking my back to get across. Why would I? Well, I suppose there are several suggestions awaiting me in the wings.

My second analogy is AdBlocker. I use it and a host of other tools to ensure a distraction free experience while at work as I spend a majority of my work on the internet. It's the most powerful tool at my disposal so I am going to keep it sharp. Not to say that frills don't add commerce and economy and publicising when it comes to the internet, more that if I know what I want then I don't need the hassle of alternatives. 

Frills are uneccessary additions to an already fine product to enhance or highlight it's best features. Dressing is an attempt to disguise the feeble nature of the item in question to make it more appealing and has no relation to the content at all whereas frills have to fit. My blog does have dressing.

I change the background every now and then. That's it. As previously mentioned, dressing has no impact on content so as far as I am concerned dressing is okay so long as it does not detract from the point being made, the discount in the shop window, the sauce upon the steak. 


It is the bombardment of both frills and dressing to specifically discombobulate that I cannot abide. Everyone needs to know where said product came from so that it can be recommended but what is throwing a thousand similar products at the same time hoping to achieve? The obvious answer is, obvious, but consider a wider spectrum, a slightly broader view.

We consumers are fought over like a championship cup. Consumers and audiences remain the same but the fighters are always going to change. Only the two best in the world compete for the title. The third best might get his chance if one of the two in the ring are knocked out but it is essentially a two player game against the best and second best at any one time. Frills and dressing are the secret weapons of both, and all competitors. The best dressing, always outshines the best meat in today's world. To dazzle, glare, entice and attract. I will not go into the confidence gains and losses in this analogy but can, leave you to imagine.
_______________________________________________________________



advertising
marketing
hypnosis